With a total of 10 nominations for this year’s upcoming Academy Awards, The Artist has largely proven to be a hit amongst both audiences and critics. Taking its inspiration from Hollywood’s silent era, the film’s fictional narrative focuses on George (Jean Dujardin), an actor who falls from popularity with the advent of the ‘talkies’. His loss of stardom takes on an added poignancy alongside the presence of Peppy (Bérénice Bejo), a young, glamorous actress who becomes a rising star with the coming of sound. But it’s not only the story of the film and its setting that are rooted in the past, The Artist is in itself a (mostly) silent film and uses various recognisable tropes of the time period in addition to its lack of dialogue.
Filmed on colour stock and converted into monochrome in post-production, the clarity of the images are as good as any contemporary film, with the black-and-white cinematography helping to recreate the glamour and romance associated with old Hollywood. Use of archaic screen transitions (such as the iris wipe, a common feature at the end of cartoons like the Looney Tunes), occasional intertitles and an old-fashioned, box-y aspect ratio also contribute to the period feel of the piece. While some viewers may find it difficult to sit through a film without speech, the plot is relatively simplistic and the performances are exaggerated just enough to aid the viewers’ understanding of events. A brilliant score accompanies the film and helps to prevent the mood from lagging, yet in some places it is the complete absence of sound that proves to be the most effective. The film’s introduction places us in the environment of a late-1920s cinema, with a silent film playing accompanied by live musicians. This film-within-the-film then ends, but rather than going straight into the next section of the soundtrack, director Hazanavicius chooses to provide us with a complete absence of sound accompanying shots of the crowd breaking into rapturous applause. This technique is used again at the film’s climax and is greatly effective in defying the audience’s expectations. Music is typically used in film-making during moments of heightened emotion or tension in order to signal to the audience how they ought to be feeling at that moment. Removing sound altogether implies that the emotion of the scene is powerful enough to be capable of standing alone.
Similarly to fellow best picture nominee Midnight in Paris, The Artist features a protagonist who seems unable to move on from the past into the present. The film also plays on the feelings of sentimentality and nostalgia that many of us feel for a bygone age. While the silent era is romanticized, the film also plays tribute to many other past eras of cinema, referencing works that in the context of the film’s early-1930s setting haven’t even been made yet. One scene towards the end of the film borrows music from Bernard Herrmann’s soundtrack to Vertigo (a decision greatly condemned by one of the film’s stars, Kim Novak) to accompany a shot depicting George looking into a shop window. This references a similar moment in Vertigo where Scotty, equally unable to let go of the past, is seen gazing into the window of a florist’s shop. While The Artist seems in many ways like an ode to great cinema of the past, these references are subtle enough and the film light-hearted enough to still appeal to viewers who don’t share Hazanavicius’ great passion and knowledge of film.
In many ways the film’s greatest appeal is in managing to recreate the silent era in a sufficiently sentimental way to keep the nostalgic among us satisfied. While this film has been hugely successful, I have to wonder whether silent cinema would remain as popular if contemporary directors left, right and centre started using this technique once again. We tend to romanticize the past, deeming the present to be unsatisfactory in comparison to ‘the good old days’. If silent film-making was to become a commonplace technique once more we would probably just find ourselves in a constant state of nostalgia for the ‘good old days’ of meaningless action films about giant robots that can turn into cars. In reality, no period of cinema has been without its fair share of bad films, but we tend to forget about this when looking back through a pair of rose-tinted glasses at it all.
The Artist‘s sentimentality comes close to being cheesy, but manages to remain more of an homage to the genre than a crude pastiche. If you have the patience to sit through a film without dialogue (and I feel very sorry for anybody who lacks the attention span to do that), this film is very rewarding. You can’t help but leave the cinema with a huge smile on your face.

Anthony Bosco
29/01/2012
Check out this new short film from an up-and-coming YouTuber:
Reminds me of INCEPTION, MEMENTO and FIGHT CLUB.
Genki Jason
30/01/2012
Nice review.
I liked how you broke down the technical details and how they created the verisimilitude the film enjoys. Dujardin is a great comedy performer and I hope we see more of him. Same with Berenice Bejo who was stunning. And Uggie deserved an Oscar nomination.
Corey Atad
30/01/2012
I thought it was a really fun, nostalgic little film as well. I wouldn’t rank it was one of the year’s best, but I certainly had a great time out at the movies. It’s interesting to wonder if silent films could be more popular if more directors made silent films. I really don’t think that would be possible. Black-and-white and Academy ratio, even more than the silence, make the film something akin to a novelty.
Looking at the world of animation you see a lot more work that could be called “silent film”. Many animated short films, including the very popular ones put out by Pixar, are basically silent films with just music and sound effects, sort of like Wings. And then last year we had the wonderful animated film, The Illusionist, which was a great little silent film in its own right. No actual dialogue, just mumbling. Even Wall-E had an opening section that played much like a silent film.
So maybe we won’t see many silent films in the style of The Artist, but it’s possible more directors will be bold enough to cut down on dialogue. I’ve heard that The Woman in Black even includes a sequence of almost dialogue for 20 or 30 minutes.
Laura Marie Scott
30/01/2012
That’s a very good point you’ve made about films like The Illusionist – although it contains basically no dialogue it’s not really categorised as a silent film. The Artist contains all the tropes we would expect from a silent film, allowing the film to be easily pigeon-holed. Although it is a bit gimmick-y and sticks to the silent film conventions from all those years ago, it’s still very enjoyable, but yes I don’t think we will see another 1920s style silent film anytime soon. There are plenty of independent films that use sparse dialogue but so far they’re mostly restricted to their niche audiences, whereas The Artist has managed to become quite mainstream!
JustMeMike
30/01/2012
Well done – this is a very enjoyable discussion of the film. You mentioned at the beginning of your 3rd paragraph:
… a protagonist who seems unable to move on from the past into the present…
Did you notice how Hazanavicius gave us a very strong hint about what we knew might happen but it hadn’t happened yet. When they meet in the studio office building, Valentin is headed down the steps, and Miller is heading up the steps.
Very subtle in one sense, but at the same time their directions seemed like arrows pointing at their future. Also that was a very creative set design for a building – not what we see in office buildings these days.
jmm
Laura Marie Scott
30/01/2012
Yes indeed I did! I was just having a discussion about this with a friend the other day, I think he intends to write an article that relates to it – something about industrialisation and the use of mass production methods in the 1920s and using this office scene as some kind of example as well. If he ends up writing it, it’ll be on artfilmnow.com so if you’re interested in some further discussion of that scene keep an eye out :) Thanks for commenting.
ciaranainsworth
15/02/2012
Wonderfully written review. I absolutely adored this film, especially for its masterful application of sound. The dream sequence was an absolute treat to watch and really made me empathise with Valentin. With this being said, I enjoy the irony of a silent film using sound more interestingly and effectively than most modern films. The last time I saw silence used so aptly was in Mononoke-Hime (which is one of my favourite ever films.)
I got into an argument with a friend about this film. She said that she didn’t want to see it as it wasn’t looking ahead and so wasn’t furthering the field of film. I argued back that it might use mostly old techniques, but it might also spark an interest in early film; a field I think is essential for the understanding of modern cinema. It is my belief that one needs to observe how film has progressed in order to understand how it should progress next. This film, however, was a pleasant surprise. It did incorporate a lot of nostalgic techniques and themes, but it also made use of some techniques not found in those films (not wanting to give too much away here.) I think my favourite bit about it apart from the use of sound was how refreshing the romantic vibe was and also how the character relationships worked, with Valentin being so close to his dog etc. And yes, I agree the dog should get an Oscar, but they banned him. Absolute rubbish.
Laura Marie Scott
15/02/2012
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the film. One of my friends also disregarded the film without having seen it. She works doing sound for short films and things so she argued that looking back at silent film was stupid when we have come so far since then. I agree with your point-of-view on the matter. How can we even appreciate sound in films without thinking about how it got here and how things were before we had it? And yes, the film also referenced some more contemporary productions, so it wasn’t simply a pastiche of silent cinema.
matrixman2351
21/02/2012
Completely agree with your beliefs as to how easily people forget that in the past we have had bad movies. This feeling of nostalgia and longing to live in the past really promotes what movies are, and escape from the real world (for most people).
And it is a damn shame that todays society lack the attention span to sit through things like this or the restored Metropolis. Silent films should definitely be left alone though; the Artist was more than enough. If people kept making these movies, then they would lack that feeling of nostalgia, and people would disregard and dislike them just like they dislike 3D, because it represents the present.
I do feel though that this movie has an unfair advantage with its score over others. Still holding a grudge over it for beating out Reznor at the globes.
sanclementejedi
21/03/2012
I was firmly in the camp of thinking that this film was going to be terrible before we reviewed it. Of course I ended up loving the Artist. It turned out to be one of my favorite films of the year. I walked out of the theater with a spring in my step and smile on my face.
Nice review
fousana
22/03/2012
Thanks a lot for this great movie review, I was going through all the reviews for the movies which will screen in OSCAR film festival in our area, Trivandrum (Kerala). So came to know about this review from one of the article regarding this festival. Looks like I am never going to miss this one, may I know in which language this film (English or French). If it is French, definitely they will provide English subtitles. Thanks again for the review :)
Reenu
22/03/2012
Fantastic review, Looking forward to watch this one in oscar festival Trivandrum !!
Reenu
22/03/2012
Actually one of my front told about this, she commented above :)